Showing posts with label Supreme Court of Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supreme Court of Canada. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 April 2024

Libel & Defamation; The Verdict of The Supreme Court of Canada

 In general, lawyers who convey to Condo owners threats of “Cease-And-Desist” followed by a stern warning to keep your mouth shut about the shortcomings of The Board of Directors and/or The Management Company, do so with a condescending attitude based on the assumption that the Condo owner is nothing short of an idiot who has no clue about the rules and regulations of the realm, and The Supreme Court of Canada, for a Condo owner, is the newest brand name of a chocolate bar introduced to the Canadian market.

Often, lawyers do not take into consideration the fact that a Condo owner may not have a fancy professional designation at the end of his name, such as a juris doctor (J.D.) or bachelor of laws (LL.B), but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Condo owner lives in an information vacuum dominated by an ignorance of the laws.

A lengthy introduction to highlight the fact that journalists, and Public Interest Bloggers (PIB), cannot perform their duties without understanding the scope of their obligations and the legal ramifications of their publications. We do not need the derision of lawyers, nor intimidations to realize that we face “Serious Risks”, often with dire consequences, especially when confronting law firms and corporations with deep pockets that can easily destroy a Public Interest Journalist (PIJ)/Blogger with lengthy lawsuits designed to bankrupt the person, and force him/her to refrain from revealing the truth about Corporate corruption, unethical modes of operations, and sheer contempt of the collective good by a culture of greed obsessed with profit.

We carry our mission with courage, and for us “Courage is not the absence of fear. It is the dedication to make the right move despite the presence of FEAR.” Our fears have been partially alleviated by The Supreme Court of Canada, when the highest Court in the realm declared in 2009 that Journalists/Public Interest Bloggers (PIB) can use the defence of "Responsible Communication" when facing defamation/libel law suits.

In a nutshell, The Supreme Court of Canada declared that a Journalist or a PIB can be absolved from any liability (a) if an attempt was made to verify the facts, and (B) the published material is a matter of public interest.  

Of course prior to publishing an article, I do solicit the opinion of the parties allegedly involved in wrongdoings, and I do consider the issues I promote through my articles as matters of “Public Interest”, because undeniably for almost 90% of Condo owners, their apartment/property is the biggest investment of their lives. Board of Directors and Management Companies adopt measures an decisions that can have a very serious impact on the biggest investment of a Condo owner, thus the vigilance and the need to hold the 4th Government, The Board, accountable for any neglect of duty that may endanger life and property.

Without freedom of speech we cannot seek accountability. Without accountability power can become blind, destructive, and used and abused for the profit of the few at the expense of the multitude facing the risk of losing their biggest investment that required decades of hard work to reach the “Mortgage Free Dwelling” status. 

n.b.
Anonymous comments will not be published. A name and an email address must be provided. If you suspect that your views are resting on shaky grounds and fail to comply with basic rules of logical reasoning, do not make any comments.

George Washington Freedom of Speech Quote Card | Zazzle




Wednesday, 6 April 2016

Freedom of Speech & Defamation




At the end of our previous article (April 02, 2016) we issued the following warning to our readers: “…do not defame the reputation of the person in a position of authority simply because he/she failed to meet certain expectations.” 

In order to understand and abstain from defaming the reputation of an individual or an identifiable group of individuals, we need to understand the legal concept known as “DEFAMATION”. It has two key components: 
A) Libel is a defamatory statement that is made in writing, print, electronic format, or any other method that produces a permanent record. 
B) Slander is a defamatory statement that is spoken or involves gestures, symbols, and signs that can harm a person’s reputation. 
Bloggers cannot engage in any form of responsible writing if they fail to understand their obligations under existing Canadian Defamation Laws.

Canadian Courts have often classified an article in print form as “libelous” or defamatory, if a judge discerned in the written text false statements, lies, or fabricated claims and the content of such a text inflicted a measurable damage on a person's reputation or financial resources.

To protect the sanctity of freedom of speech guaranteed by The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (a.k.a. The Charter) and entrenched in the Constitution of Canada, judges have pointed out in their verdicts that Statements that are damaging and true are not defamation.”

For example, let us dissect a fictional situation. You are sitting in a coffee shop sipping your favorite latte and reading “The Toronto Sun” left behind by a patron. All of a sudden you see the familiar name of a neighbor who lives in your condo complex and happens to be a Board member. You want to cover all the details meticulously so you focus closely on the title “Drugs Seized At Pearson Two Arrested”. In the text you see the name, age, and profession of your neighbor who has convinced you years ago that he is a very successful real estate agent, but due to mysterious reasons he decided to sacrifice his reputation, and launch a new business venture in the field of coordinating the supply and demand of drugs in The City of Toronto. 

YES, you can go home and fire dozens of emails to your neighbors who should know what kind of a person is living in their midst, and you may want to promote his ouster from The Board of Directors of your condominium because of the nature of the crime allegedly committed, but chose your words wisely. What you read in the newspaper is nothing but an “allegation”. Nothing has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. You still have a moral and legal obligation to balance your freedom to voice a concern with adequate safeguards to prevent a permanent harm to the reputation of your neighbor who is also a Board member. 

NO, your neighbor does not have a reasonable chance of obtaining a favorable verdict in a lawsuit accusing you of libel. A judge will dismiss it from the early stages of the game for several reasons:
A) He destroyed his own reputation by engaging in a criminal activity-importing illegal chemicals/drugs.
B) In a December 2009 decision, The Supreme Court of Canada said that journalists/bloggers/twitters should be able to report statements and allegations if there’s a public interest in distributing the information to a wide audience, especially if the news was urgent, serious, and of public importance, and the journalists/bloggers used reliable sources, and tried to get and report the other side of the story.

However, bloggers beware of a danger that has spread its tentacles during the last decade and managed to silence a dozen of bloggers/Condominium Owners in The City of Toronto by relying heavily on SLAPPStrategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation”. Slapp’s primary purpose is to suffocate any form of criticism centering on publicizing the shortcomings of a Condominium Board of Directors. Without any valid legal premise, The Board because it has access to huge financial resources, instructs a lawyer to launch a defamation lawsuit against a blogger, while being well aware that the chances of succeeding are extremely slim and sometimes non-existent. By peddling to the blogger a gloom and doom scenario of the heavy financial burden he has to shoulder in case he wants to challenge in a court of law the unreasonable allegations of The Board, and fearful of a guaranteed financial ruin, the blogger surrenders to The Board and shutts down his blogging site. So measure twice, cut once.

LEGAL NOTICE:
This article should not be relied upon or construed, implicitly or explicitly, as an individualized legal opinion/advice on the issue of defamation. Readers should seek the legal opinion of a lawyer who specializes in this specific domain. The article is strictly for educational purposes, with the key objective of emphasizing the cardinal role of maintaining a balanced approach when criticizing a Condominium Board or a Management Company that acts as the executive arm of The Board.

Admin The 215 Forum © April 06, 2016