Letter reproduced below was emailed to the supervisor of
our Senior Property Manager to highlight the double standards used in the
process of dealing with bicycles theft in the complex and addressing the death
threat the administrator of this blog was exposed to a few weeks ago. You shape
your own conclusions.
===========================================================
Dear Madam,
On Friday June
16/17 I discovered in the underground parking lot of our condominium (P2
section C69) a death threat “MOVE OR DIE” with a bullet attached to it left
on my car’s windshield. I notified the Police immediately and an investigation
was launched by PC …. (Badge#.....) File# ………8.
Officer C….. went with me to the underground parking
lot, made an assessment of the entrances and exits connected to Section C,
spoke with her superior and a decision was made to send the note and the bullet
attached for forensic analysis. She went also to "The Gatehouse" of the
complex to review any surveillance tape that may lead to a suspect.
It is hard to accept at face value the argument that the
“Gatehouse Team” failed to notify The RSO about the police presence in the
complex, or refrained totally from reporting the death threat incident to the
Senior Property Manager.
In the past, especially with the all the complications
we had with the garbage compactor, and despite seeking at the rate of 2 to 3 times a
week the intervention of The Gatehouse to shut off the compactor due to a
faulty sensor that was switching the machine to a non-stop continuous operational
mode for hours, it took The RSO about 12 months to act and seek a solution from the manufacturer
of the compactor. The RSO argued that none of the incidents were reported by The
Gatehouse. The Gatehouse insisted that every incident was reported, and no one
in a position of power bothered to read the reports, or if and when they read
it (on rare occasions), a deliberate decision was made to dismiss it as a very
trivial complaint that does not deserve any form of intervention.
This same frame of mind, forced senior decision makers
of The RSO to refrain from placing notices on “Notice Boards” located near
elevators or the mail room, to solicit the help of unit owners who park their
cars in P2 C section, who may have seen strangers engaging in questionable
activities relevant to the death threat incident. Many unit owners have “Dash
Cams” in their cars and a notice could have prompted them to review the stored
video clips and report to The Gatehouse or The Police their findings.
Unfortunately, the incident was deemed trivial by The RSO and no notices were
placed on boards or distributed door-to-door.
But when bicycles were stolen or vandalized, a notice
dated July 07, 2017 and titled “Bicycle Theft in Parking Garage”,
was distributed door-to-door and posted on several boards to reassure the
residents that The RSO and the staff under its supervision, “…are actively investigating
these incidents thoroughly reviewing the buildings’ video surveillance footage…Building
staff are also on heightened alert.”
It seems that The Senior Property Manager under your
supervision did not deem protecting the life of a unit owner worthy of any form
of intervention. For her, stolen bicycles are more worthy of her staff’s
attention than the life of an owner who, as recently as February 2017 accused
her of organizing the most unethical but legal elections during The AGM of
2017.
I am convinced that the moral compass of a person who
values bicycles more than a human life is beyond salvation, and you as her
supervisor you should consider reassigning her to a location where the majority
of unit owners have a strong dose of contempt for human life and value more
their earthly material possessions.
Admin “The 215 Forum” © 2017
